Close

Articles Posted in Lanham Act 43(a) – 15 USC 1125

Updated:

Nutritional Dietary Supplement Trademark & False Designation Lawsuit

Santa Ana, CA – Nutrivita is a dietary supplement distributor, including the Arthro-7 nutraceutical supplement which is advertised as alleviating joint pain. The Arthro-7 trademark registered with the USPTO on October 24, 2000. Plaintiff alleges that in July of 2010 it began receiving inquiries from customers and retailers regarding the…

Updated:

Aunt Joy’s Cakes Sued For Infringing See’s Candy Trademark

Los Angeles, CA – Columbia Insurance Company owns the See’s Candy trademarks and exclusively licenses the marks back to See’s Candy Shops, Inc. The See’s Candy trademarks were first used in 1921 and have been registered with the USPTO and in other countries. Aunt Joy’s sells cakes, cookies and chocolate-based…

Updated:

The Wine Group Sues Diageo Over Savannah Trademark

San Francisco, CA – The Wine Group has filed a trademark infringement lawsuit in the Northern District Court of California against Diageo PLC. Plaintiff sells a wine-based beverage that contains tea flavors under its Olde Savannah Southern Style Sweet Tea trademark, which it started using in December of 2009. According…

Updated:

True Religion On the Wrong End Of A Horseshoe Trademark Cancellation & Infringement Lawsuit

Plaintiff Philip Duff is suing True Religion jeans for copying his horseshoe pocket design that he registered with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office in 1995, long before True Religion began using the horseshoe design on its jeans. According to the complaint filed in the U.S. District Court in Los…

Updated:

Forever 21 Sues Forever 26 For Trademark Infringement and 15 USC § 1125 Unfair Competition

Los Angeles, CA – Forever 21 is the ubiquitous clothing and accessories retailer that began doing business in 1989. Forever 21 is the owner of numerous USPTO registrations for its “21” family of trademarks, including “Forever 21”, “XXI” and “XXI forever”. In December of 2009, Plaintiff asserts that it demanded…

Updated:

Twilight Saga: Bella And Twilight Clothing Unleashes Trademark And Copyright Infringement Lawsuit

Los Angeles, CA – Summit Entertainment is the producer and distributor of the highly successful Twilight motion picture franchise, including The Twilight Saga: New Moon, and the soon to be released Eclipse. The movies are about a teenage girl, Isabella (Bella”) Swan, who falls in love with a vampire, Edward…

Updated:

Here’s Looking At Humphrey Bogart’s Right of Publicity and Trademark Infringement Lawsuit

Los Angeles, CA – Humphrey Bogart appeared in more than seventy motion pictures, including classics such as Casablanca, The Maltese Falcon, and The African Queen. Bogart, LLC, the plaintiff in the case, is the successor-in-interest of all intellectual property rights and assets associated with Humphrey Bogart, which rights were acquired…

Updated:

Court Dismisses Dr. Dre’s Lanham Act & Right Of Publicity Claims Against Death Row

Los Angeles, CA – Dr. Dre sued the new Death Row records for breach of contract, trademark infringement, false advertising, violation of the right of publicity, and unfair competition. Details blogged here, and read the complaint here. Dr. Dre alleged that he’s owed royalties on his music album “The Crhonic,”…

Updated:

“Torture Room” Movie and Screenplay Copyright Infringement Lawsuit Filed

Los Angeles, CA – Randles Films is the owner of the copyright registrations in the original “Torture Room” screenplay and the revisions thereto. Randles also produced the movie and also registered the copyright therefor. Defendants Quantum, Moviebank, and Bridge Entertainment are accused of wrongfully copying and distributing the movie. Randles…

Updated:

Levi Strauss Sues Gardeur Over Pocket Stitching Designs On Jeans

San Francisco, CA – Clothing and jeans giant Levi Strauss owns several USPTO registered trademarks for its arcuate stitching design initially used in 1873, which it alleges is the oldest known clothing trademark in the United States. Based on this long and continued use, Levi Strauss alleges that its trademarks…

Contact Us
Start Chat